Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Title: Critical Reentrancy Vulnerability in postTransaction Function #11

Open
dkrizhanovskyi opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@dkrizhanovskyi
Copy link

Description:

A critical reentrancy vulnerability has been identified in the Paymaster contract, specifically in the postTransaction function. This vulnerability allows malicious actors to recursively call the contract and drain its entire balance. Immediate attention and remediation are required.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.	Deploy a malicious contract with the following receive() function to exploit the vulnerability:

receive() external payable {
if (address(paymaster).balance > 0) {
paymaster.postTransaction(...); // Recursive call
}
}

2.	Interact with the Paymaster contract using the malicious contract, triggering the postTransaction function.
3.	Observe that the contract’s balance is depleted due to repeated recursive calls.

Impact:

•	Financial Loss: All ETH in the contract can be drained by an attacker.
•	Reputation Damage: Exploitation of this vulnerability could erode trust in the platform and harm the ecosystem.
•	Operational Disruption: The Paymaster contract will become non-functional, impacting users reliant on it for fee payments.

Root Cause:

The vulnerability arises from the following line in the postTransaction function:

userAddress.call{value: address(this).balance}("");

This line makes an unprotected external call, allowing reentrant execution. The absence of a reentrancy guard enables attackers to exploit this behavior.

Recommended Mitigation:

1.	Implement a Reentrancy Guard:

Use OpenZeppelin’s ReentrancyGuard or equivalent to protect the postTransaction function.

import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol";

contract Paymaster is ReentrancyGuard {
function postTransaction(...) external nonReentrant {
// Function logic
}
}

2.	Avoid Using call for ETH Transfers:

Replace call with safer transfer methods such as transfer or send to limit gas forwarded to the recipient.
3. Validate Contract Balances:
Ensure sufficient balances are retained in the contract after every transfer.

Proof of Concept (PoC):

A proof-of-concept malicious contract that demonstrates the exploit:

pragma solidity 0.8.20;

contract Malicious {
Paymaster public paymaster;

constructor(address _paymaster) {
    paymaster = Paymaster(_paymaster);
}

receive() external payable {
    if (address(paymaster).balance > 0) {
        paymaster.postTransaction(...); // Recursive call
    }
}

function attack() external {
    paymaster.postTransaction(...); // Initial call
}

}

Suggested Fix:

Update the postTransaction function to include a reentrancy guard and safer transfer logic. For example:

function postTransaction(...) external payable nonReentrant override {
address userAddress = address(uint160(_transaction.from));
uint256 balance = address(this).balance;

require(balance > 0, "Insufficient balance");

(bool success,) = userAddress.call{value: balance}("");
require(success, "Transfer failed");

}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant