[Idea] GitHub Pages Site #6
Replies: 3 comments
-
@rtfmkiesel, thanks for bringing it up! And yes, we can surely work on the pages. Please feel free to create a new branch by name |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I can't add a new branch as I'm not a maintainer. I also can't start a discussion for the same reason. You'll have to accept my pull request. I'll try to finish the first version of the website this weekend. Here is a preview: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Why did you change the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Discussions are locked, so I'm writing this here.
It would be cool to have a site on GitHub pages for this repo. This would be easier to navigate than the GitHub repo structure. Also, a "Copy" button besides code blocks could be used to copy a bambda directly without selecting it first. Maybe https://github.com/sighingnow/jekyll-gitbook is an option here.
The main problem here is that bambdas are currently stored as individual Java files. This would not work as static site generators usually want Markdown. The option then would be to store bambdas in an easily parsable format like YAML or JSON. (Where also categories, author and co. could be specified) Before the site gets built using the static site generator, a pre-build script could be used to assemble the markdown pages.
I'd be happy to help here, but I would like your thoughts on this before I start.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions