Modify the syntax

[5ouma]

⚠️ Issue

close #

🔄 Type of the Change

• 🎉 New Feature
• 🧰 Bug
• 🛡️ Security
• 📖 Documentation
• 🏎️ Performance
• 🧹 Refactoring
• 🧪 Testing
• 🔧 Maintenance
• 🎽 CI
• 🧠 Meta

✏️ Description

• Don't write a return on a single-state
• Move the description in the PR template up
• Remove the Codecov token from the README
• Add the word "check" for job names

• I agree to follow the
  Code of Conduct.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (204f475) to head (3958753).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #102   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            6         6           
  Lines          113        93   -20     
  Branches         6         6           
=========================================
- Hits           113        93   -20     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several changes across multiple files. It adds a new "Description" section to the pull request template, prompting contributors to provide a clear rationale for their changes. The CI workflow configuration is updated to enhance clarity by renaming job names from "Lint" to "Lint Check" and from "Format" to "Format Check." Additionally, the README file's code coverage badge link is simplified. Lastly, the wildcard GET route handling in the server code is streamlined using an inline arrow function.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md	Added "### ✏️ Description" section with a comment block for contributors to describe their changes.
.github/workflows/ci.yml	Renamed job Lint to Lint Check and job Format to Format Check for clarity.
README.md	Updated Codecov badge link to a simpler format without a token parameter.
src/server.ts	Simplified wildcard GET route handling by using an inline arrow function instead of a block function.

Possibly related PRs

• Support labeling for tagpr #93: Modifies the .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md file, directly related to the changes in this PR.
• Use Hono env adapter instead of the Deno.env() #64: Involves changes to the deno.json file, potentially relevant to pull request structure.
• Make reproxy workable on Bun and Cloudfalre Workers #67: Updates the README.md with instructions that could relate to contributor interactions with the pull request template.
• JS doesn't export globally with module import #70: Modifies the README.md, relevant to how contributors are guided to use the pull request template.
• Use deno serve for compatibility #82: Changes in README.md and deno.json, which may relate to overall documentation and contributor guidance.
• Format all docs with deno fmt #86: Focuses on formatting documentation, potentially relating to the clarity of the pull request template.
• Use tagpr to prepare releasing #91: Modifies the release workflow, relevant if the pull request template is used in release contexts.
• Use new features of tagpr #99: Updates labeling configuration, which may relate to how pull requests are categorized and processed.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1)

16-18: Consider removing redundant spacing.

There are two consecutive spacing elements: an empty line followed by a <br /> tag. Consider keeping just the <br /> tag for consistent spacing throughout the template.

 -->
-
 <br />

src/server.ts (1)

57-57: LGTM! Consider adding return type annotation for completeness.

The simplified arrow function maintains the same functionality while reducing verbosity, which aligns well with the PR's refactoring objectives.

For enhanced type safety, consider adding the return type annotation:

-  .get("*", (ctx: Context) => ctx.redirect("/", STATUS_CODE.SeeOther));
+  .get("*", (ctx: Context): Response => ctx.redirect("/", STATUS_CODE.SeeOther));

.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)

19-19: Consider standardizing the OS name casing.

The runner OS is specified as "Ubuntu-Latest", but GitHub Actions typically uses "ubuntu-latest" (all lowercase).

-    runs-on: Ubuntu-Latest
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

Also applies to: 36-36

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0079e10 and 3958753.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/ci.yml (2 hunks)
• README.md (1 hunks)
• src/server.ts (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• README.md

🔇 Additional comments (2)

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1)

9-15: LGTM! Well-structured Description section.

The new Description section is well-positioned and includes helpful prompting questions that will guide contributors to provide better context for their changes. The comment block effectively guides users to explain both the rationale and advantages of their approach.

.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)

19-19: LGTM! Job name changes improve consistency.

The renaming of "Lint" to "Lint Check" and "Format" to "Format Check" brings better consistency with existing job names like "Type Check". This improves the clarity and maintainability of the workflow.

Also applies to: 36-36