Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pin workflows hash #135

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2024
Merged

Pin workflows hash #135

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2024

Conversation

5ouma
Copy link
Owner

@5ouma 5ouma commented Dec 7, 2024

⚠️ Issue

close #


✏️ Description

Prevent changing them without updating.


🔄 Type of the Change

  • 🎉 New Feature
  • 🧰 Bug
  • 🛡️ Security
  • 📖 Documentation
  • 🏎️ Performance
  • 🧹 Refactoring
  • 🧪 Testing
  • 🔧 Maintenance
  • 🎽 CI
  • 🧠 Meta

Prevent changing them without updating.
@Copilot Copilot bot review requested due to automatic review settings December 7, 2024 10:38
@prlabeler prlabeler bot added the 🎽 CI Changes to CI configuration files and scripts label Dec 7, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (52e9506) to head (22da287).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #135   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            6         6           
  Lines           93        93           
  Branches         6         6           
=========================================
  Hits            93        93           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to the GitHub Actions workflow configurations for a Deno project. Specifically, the version of the setup-deno-with-cache action in the CI workflow and the pre-commit action in the pre-commit workflow have been changed to specific commit hashes. This ensures that the workflows utilize consistent and reliable versions of the actions across multiple jobs.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yml Updated action version from main to specific commit 6b0f1acc62243ae009e5174cf2a9a39b75bec46e for jobs: lint-check, format-check, type-check, test, dry-run-publish.
.github/workflows/pre-commit.yml Updated action version from commit 23aec800e821891339568c454135bb9befe36fce to 13661aa27741f7c7771ace67ad008d1931dd01b7.

Possibly related PRs

  • Run Deno tests in parallel #61: The changes in the CI workflow configuration for the Deno project are directly related as both PRs involve modifications to the .github/workflows/ci.yml file, focusing on CI processes for Deno.
  • Cache Deno project dependencies #79: This PR also modifies the CI configuration in .github/workflows/ci.yml, specifically updating the setup for Deno with caching, which aligns with the main PR's focus on CI workflow improvements.
  • Use my setup action #111: This PR updates the CI workflow in .github/workflows/ci.yml, changing the action used for setting up Deno with caching, which is directly relevant to the changes made in the main PR.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between aaa755b and 22da287.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (5 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pre-commit.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/pre-commit.yml
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@5ouma 5ouma merged commit c56eb87 into main Dec 7, 2024
13 checks passed
@5ouma 5ouma deleted the ci-workflow-hash branch December 7, 2024 10:41
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2024
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🎽 CI Changes to CI configuration files and scripts
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant