You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The idea here is to highlight researchers whose work is being highly read. Some work may be read far more than it is cited.
We could track papers over time that are read using citeulike and Mendeley for individual researchers. This may be just a current snapshot, or if dates are available it could show the growing number of reads over time.
Citeulike also has a rating feature where readers can give paper one to five stars (a bit like IMDB or goodreads). So there is the possibility of creating a list of the top-rated papers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The idea here is to highlight researchers whose work is being highly read. Some work may be read far more than it is cited.
We could track papers over time that are read using citeulike and Mendeley for individual researchers. This may be just a current snapshot, or if dates are available it could show the growing number of reads over time.
Citeulike also has a rating feature where readers can give paper one to five stars (a bit like IMDB or goodreads). So there is the possibility of creating a list of the top-rated papers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: