Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lsq rdfize and lsq benchmark use different ID schema #18

Open
Aklakan opened this issue Mar 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

lsq rdfize and lsq benchmark use different ID schema #18

Aklakan opened this issue Mar 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@Aklakan
Copy link
Member

Aklakan commented Mar 10, 2021

The initial idea was to reuse information contained in the static RDFization in the benchmark process.
I.e. instead of trying to parse an ID out from an IRI it should be assembled from attributes.

However, for some reason rdfization and running benchmarking does not yield matching graph IRIs

lsq rdfize:

<http://lsq.aksw.org/q-0ez272gh_Z4IFrwv_dbCEpkmz5ZnL5VaDwmja75SFPE>

lsq benchmark run:

lsqr:lsqQuery-0DgPrLmzT2lANsdflr3XIUpdNZgT09YRsOnbZ9gA7CE

Obviously, also the prefix declarations are not yet consistently used.

It may well be that the only differenec is in q- vs lsqQuery.
In other query logs there is the issue of hex-encoding of checksums vs base64 encoding but this might have been fixed already. Because the latter yields shorter IRIs this one should be used.

@Aklakan Aklakan self-assigned this Mar 10, 2021
@Aklakan
Copy link
Member Author

Aklakan commented May 19, 2021

This issue has been addressed but again a test suite should be added.
All active LSQ code should now use the annotation-based skolemization system; but there are still some leftovers of the utterly complex programmatic approach.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant