-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AMICI failed to integrate the forward problem in PEtab problem, encountered NaN values #1796
Comments
I would guess that having empty cells in the condition table will lead to issues. They are interpreted as NaNs which amici seems to complain about. |
Thanks. Makes sense. I thought it just takes the default model value if nothing is provided and only the changes should be written in the condition table. Will close this after testing. |
@matthiaskoenig : Yes, that is what is supposed to happen. If this is not the case, please re-open. I didn't get to run your example yet. |
I thought that writing the
reads for me, that you have to set the |
Should be fixed in the PEtab library via PEtab-dev/libpetab-python#150 |
Hi all,
when running the attached PETab Problem I see failing forward integration.
icg_sd.zip
I tried to simulate the model with
and get the following errors
Directly loading the model with AMICI and simulating it works without problems, i.e. the following code is successful for the model file
resulting in
Best Matthias
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: