Customized inputs file for Moving EB_CNS problem #3264
-
|
Hi! I've been trying to use AMReX EB_CNS to reporduce the results exhibited in the paper "A moving embedded boundary approach for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations in a block-structured adaptive refinement framework" by Natarajan, Mahesh; Grout, Ray; Zhang, Weiqun; Day, Marc (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022JCoPh.46511315N/abstract) I've been trying to edit the inputs files and prob_parm headfiles in ShockRef and Sod examples to create a moving geometry but failed. Is it possible to recurrent the numerial simualtions mentioned in the paper by simply editing input data or is it necessary to edit the core codes? I found a post (#2914) regarding this problem. May I ask if I can make a query for the repo? Thank you very much! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Yeah, that was in a completely separate repo that was branched off of an old version of AMReX as a one-off and then customized extensively. None of that functionality was pulled back into AMReX directly. Mahesh, a former member of my group, did the coding for that independently and I have a copy of the repo when he left our group. Reach out to me at [email protected] privately and I'll help get you a copy of that to look at and play with. Note that there is a move to reimplement those ideas in the context of a more modern AMReX release - perhaps @asalmgren can provide info for this more current work. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you very much! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We are working on an incompressible moving EB code based on AMReX but that is not ready to be open-source yet. However, we don't currently have plans to provide the moving EB-CNS code within AMReX itself. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Yeah, that was in a completely separate repo that was branched off of an old version of AMReX as a one-off and then customized extensively. None of that functionality was pulled back into AMReX directly. Mahesh, a former member of my group, did the coding for that independently and I have a copy of the repo when he left our group. Reach out to me at [email protected] privately and I'll help get you a copy of that to look at and play with. Note that there is a move to reimplement those ideas in the context of a more modern AMReX release - perhaps @asalmgren can provide info for this more current work.