From 5a692fc66f980dbd3c75f7e052d690a469e0f5d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Stephanie J. Spielman" Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:07:19 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] move that sentence maybe --- content/100.figure-table-legends.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/100.figure-table-legends.md b/content/100.figure-table-legends.md index 72f0049..f7699ef 100644 --- a/content/100.figure-table-legends.md +++ b/content/100.figure-table-legends.md @@ -103,11 +103,12 @@ All remaining columns give the number of libraries (as designated with `(L)`) wi ![**Figure S1. Results from benchmarking `alevin-fry` and `CellRanger` performance.**](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexsLemonade/scpca-paper-figures/main/figures/compiled_figures/pngs/figure_s1.png?sanitize=true){#fig:figs3 width="7in"} Each panel compares metrics for six representative ScPCA libraries, including three single-cell and three single-nuclei suspensions, obtained when processing data with both `alevin-fry` and `CellRanger`. -Panels B-D consider only cells present in both the `alevin-fry` and `CellRanger` output. A. Runtime in minutes (top row) and peak memory in GB (bottom row) for six ScPCA libraries processed with `alevin-fry` and `CellRanger`. Processing with `alevin-fry` was consistently faster and more memory-efficient compared to processing with `CellRanger`. +Panels B-D show only cells present in both the `alevin-fry` and `CellRanger` output. + B. Comparison of mean gene expression values for six ScPCA libraries processed with `alevin-fry` and `CellRanger`, shown on a log-scale. Each point is a gene, and only genes detected in at least 5 cells are shown. $R^2$ values shown in the top left corner of each panel reflect broad agreement in mean gene expression values between platforms.