Skip to content

Explicit vs Implicit formulation #76

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Dear Jianlin Huang,
the reason is hystorical: when we started working with Anura, more than 10 years ago, we were focusing on dynamic fast problems, thus the explicit formulation was the best option. Moreover, it is easier to implement.
Later, we also worked on implicit formulation and a very first version following the work by Lars Beuth is in Anura and you can check it in the code and further develop it. There are numbers of complications in using an implicit formulation with large deformations in MPM; despite most of them have been discussed in the literature, explicit is still simpler and appropriate for most applications.
If you have ideas or want to work on this please come back to …

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by murphy-john
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants