Log attitude information at full resolution

[andyp1per]

We are artificially quantizing the attitude information in the attitude log message. This makes it very hard to relate to the rate logging which is logged at full resolution. There is really no reason to quantize like this other than to save a little bit of log bandwidth.

Split from #27029

[peterbarker]

Need to divide the targets:

[peterbarker]

We are artificially quantizing the attitude information in the attitude log message. This makes it very hard to relate to the rate logging which is logged at full resolution. There is really no reason to quantize like this other than to save a little bit of log bandwidth.

"a little bit of log bandwidth" sounds a little handy-wavey. Roughly speaking this will double the size of the message.

Which will move its proportion of a log from maybe 0.75% to 1.5%, based on the Plane.AUTOTEST log I'm looking at here.

[peterbarker]

Need to scale targets

[andyp1per]

Need to divide the targets:

Fixed. I actually think this is much cleaner now. Might even save a little flash.

[peterbarker]

Fewer cd is good!

[peterbarker]

I do like the change to log in floats.

But I keep finding these trivial cases where we are breaking ATT, one of the most important logging messages we have. Please check the log message is correct for all vehicles after your changes.

[peterbarker]

LGTM.

Please state what testing you've given the various vehicles.

[andyp1per]

I have eyeballed logs from vehicles to check that desired and actual line up.

[tridge]

@andyp1per with the decision to add an ANG message, do you still want this change?

[rmackay9]

I like this change