You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Goal: base bean properties on a class's fields (that have getters/setters) rather than using JavaBean definitions. The current concept has been outgrown now that we support @Comment on the field—it's awkward that @ExportName needs to be set on a method, not to mention that @Transient is hard to "find out" about.
Open point: For #135, we might have to infer the properties not by field but maybe by a method or constructor that is annotated somehow... So a bean property class probably can't have a "setValue" anymore? ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Goal: base bean properties on a class's fields (that have getters/setters) rather than using JavaBean definitions. The current concept has been outgrown now that we support
@Comment
on the field—it's awkward that@ExportName
needs to be set on a method, not to mention that@Transient
is hard to "find out" about.Note: This is probably a prerequisite for #135.
To do:
@ExportName
to go on fields@Ignore
annotation to ignore properties? Might be useful later on if we have "value classes" -> Prototype other way of handling properties #12Open point: For #135, we might have to infer the properties not by field but maybe by a method or constructor that is annotated somehow... So a bean property class probably can't have a "setValue" anymore? ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: