You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 12, 2018. It is now read-only.
Right now the vendor and unlabeled (no typo here) branches are excluded. However there are a number of preserved branches and tags (up to 5.9 I think) that got populated based on these branches. Don't we have to keep them then?
Examples:
vendor: r11659 or r12315
unlabeled: r10640
Note: if we decide to keep the unlabeled branches we have to put them into a (at least) 2-level hierarchy because there're a lot of them, e.g.: unlabeled/1.285.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Right now the
vendor
andunlabeled
(no typo here) branches are excluded. However there are a number of preserved branches and tags (up to 5.9 I think) that got populated based on these branches. Don't we have to keep them then?Examples:
Note: if we decide to keep the
unlabeled
branches we have to put them into a (at least) 2-level hierarchy because there're a lot of them, e.g.:unlabeled/1.285.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: