Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 12, 2018. It is now read-only.

Preservation of "vendor" and "unlabeled" branches as source of other preserved branches #22

Open
brevilo opened this issue Dec 21, 2012 · 0 comments

Comments

@brevilo
Copy link

brevilo commented Dec 21, 2012

Right now the vendor and unlabeled (no typo here) branches are excluded. However there are a number of preserved branches and tags (up to 5.9 I think) that got populated based on these branches. Don't we have to keep them then?

Examples:

  • vendor: r11659 or r12315
  • unlabeled: r10640

Note: if we decide to keep the unlabeled branches we have to put them into a (at least) 2-level hierarchy because there're a lot of them, e.g.: unlabeled/1.285.2

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant