You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reviewing again validations in the literature I came across to "topological asymmetry". It is not the same as the "partition" feature in NeuroM. @lidakanari could you help with a precise formula and further references. Just in case you have some lines of experimental code, it would also help. One reference is:
Schneider, Cuntz and Soltesz 2014.: "linking macroscopic with microscopic neuroanatomy using synthetic neuronal populations". PLOS Computational Biology
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reviewing again validations in the literature I came across to "topological asymmetry". It is not the same as the "partition" feature in NeuroM. @lidakanari could you help with a precise formula and further references. Just in case you have some lines of experimental code, it would also help. One reference is:
Schneider, Cuntz and Soltesz 2014.: "linking macroscopic with microscopic neuroanatomy using synthetic neuronal populations". PLOS Computational Biology
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: