-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add manufacturing breakdown details #71
Comments
After a short discussion, the initial idea would be to retain the most relevant parts only, and accumulate the rest to "others". |
ggael
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2022
At this time we have the following parts in the data model:
I suggest to keep :
|
I made the following changes to resolve this issue :
@ggael could you modify piechart_analyser.py on the same way? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Most PCF files provides breakdown details for the manufacturing part. They are, however, not always fully consistent on the partitioning. Here is the list I ended up on ecodiag's side:
This long list is conservative, but that's a lot ! So maybe some components could be merged together ?
For instance, when the PSU is combined with the chassis, maybe we could just put it to "others" since this does not provide much information.
Some other propositions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: