You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issues does not seems to have "bad" consequences as it is corrected once shiny takes the lead. However, I believe it does not cost much to fix this.
Currently when we call set_workspace, the list of stacks is only returned at the end. As a result, if there is any result block within a second stack, it has no idea of the first stack, which yields a wrong value at initialisation (corrected by shiny later).
Since we have add_workspace_stack available and we rarely use it, set_workspace could just iterate over the passed elements and add the stacks one by one with add_workspace_stack.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In that you have "consistency" at the moment of instantiating the result block and not only after the first post-init update round, but this depends on the order of arguments. For a call as
Discussed with @nbenn.
This issues does not seems to have "bad" consequences as it is corrected once shiny takes the lead. However, I believe it does not cost much to fix this.
Currently when we call
set_workspace
, the list of stacks is only returned at the end. As a result, if there is any result block within a second stack, it has no idea of the first stack, which yields a wrong value at initialisation (corrected by shiny later).Since we have
add_workspace_stack
available and we rarely use it, set_workspace could just iterate over the passed elements and add the stacks one by one withadd_workspace_stack
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: