From 0bf4ff3ae2e161ae7193409a1f3e7a1aec7d447e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: adelaett <90894311+adelaett@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:21:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] progress in the proof of continuation trans --- theories/trans.v | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/theories/trans.v b/theories/trans.v index 535ed7f..39efd64 100644 --- a/theories/trans.v +++ b/theories/trans.v @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ Fixpoint trans_conts (kappa: list cont) : list cont := | CDefaultPure :: kappa => CSome :: trans_conts kappa | CDefault b None ts tj tc :: kappa => - CMatch (monad_handle_zero (List.map trans ts) (trans tj) (trans tc)) (monad_handle_one' (Var 0) (List.map trans ts)) :: trans_conts kappa + CMatch (monad_handle_zero (List.map trans ts) (trans tj) (trans tc)) (monad_handle_one (Var 0) (List.map trans ts)) :: trans_conts kappa | CDefault b (Some v) ts tj tc :: kappa => CMatch (monad_handle_one' (Value (trans_value v)) (List.map trans ts)) (Conflict) :: trans_conts kappa end. @@ -415,6 +415,62 @@ Proof. induction op, v1, v2, v; simpl in *; tryfalse; eauto. Qed. +Lemma step_left {A: Type} {R: A -> A -> Prop} {a1 a2 b}: + R a1 a2 -> + (exists target, + star R a2 target /\ star R b target) -> + (exists target, + star R a1 target /\ star R b target). +Proof. + intros; unpack; eexists; split;[eapply star_step|]; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma step_right {A: Type} {R: A -> A -> Prop} {a b1 b2}: + R b1 b2 -> + (exists target, + star R a target /\ star R b2 target) -> + (exists target, + star R a target /\ star R b1 target). +Proof. + intros; unpack; eexists; split;[|eapply star_step]; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma star_step_left {A: Type} {R: A -> A -> Prop} {a1 a2 b}: + star R a1 a2 -> + (exists target, + star R a2 target /\ star R b target) -> + (exists target, + star R a1 target /\ star R b target). +Proof. + intros Hstar; revert b. + induction Hstar; eauto; intros; unpack. + eapply step_left; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma star_step_right {A: Type} {R: A -> A -> Prop} {a b1 b2}: + star R b1 b2 -> + (exists target, + star R a target /\ star R b2 target) -> + (exists target, + star R a target /\ star R b1 target). +Proof. + intros Hstar; revert a. + induction Hstar; eauto; intros; unpack. + eapply step_right; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma diagram_finish {A: Type} {R: A -> A -> Prop} {a}: + (exists target, + star R a target /\ star R a target). +Proof. + eexists; split; eauto with sequences. +Qed. + +(* Lemma star_step_lift: + forall s1 s2, + s1 *) + + Theorem correction_continuations: forall s1 s2, (exists GGamma Gamma T, jt_state GGamma Gamma s1 T) -> @@ -425,6 +481,10 @@ Theorem correction_continuations: star cred (trans_state s2) target. Proof. + Ltac step := ( + try (eapply step_left; [solve [econstructor; simpl; eauto]|]); + try (eapply step_right; [solve [econstructor; simpl; eauto]|]) + ). intros s1 s2. intros (GGamma & Gamma & T & Hty). intros Hsred. @@ -442,10 +502,16 @@ Proof. destruct h as (var & ?) | [h: _ /\ _ |- _] => destruct h - end. + + (* all: try induction o; try induction phi; simpl; repeat ( + try (eapply step_left; [solve [econstructor; eauto]|]); + try (eapply step_right; [solve [econstructor; eauto]|]) + ). + all: try eapply diagram_finish. *) (* try to just run on both side. *) all: try solve [ + try induction o; try induction phi; simpl; eexists; split; repeat (eapply star_step; [econstructor; simpl; eauto|]); eapply star_refl @@ -454,14 +520,13 @@ Proof. eexists; split; asimpl; [|eapply star_refl]. eapply star_one; simpl; econstructor; eauto using List.map_nth_error. } - { induction o; simpl; eexists; split; repeat (eapply star_step; [econstructor; simpl; eauto|]). - all: eapply star_refl_eq; eauto. - repeat f_equal. - admit. - } - { simpl; eexists; split; repeat (eapply star_step; [econstructor; simpl; eauto|]). - (* more involved. *) - admit. + { simpl; repeat step. + induction ts; simpl. + { repeat step. eapply diagram_finish. } + { repeat step. unpack. + pose proof (IHts H2). + unpack. + } } { induction phi; try induction o.