Consider changing access modifier for Heirloom.MiniAudio

[asrulhadi]

Hi,

Would you consider changing Heirloom.MiniAudio from internal class es to public class?

This will give access for other project to used it, independently from Heirloom framework.

[Chamberlain91]

It's a bit more complicated than a simple binding for MA. I had to write my own C layer to adapt the structs because MA (at least at the time of writing it) would have a different context struct depending on the platform it was compiled for. So I wrote a wrapper in C to allocate and expose only the parts I needed to C#.

I could consider revisiting and maybe rewriting a new C# bindings if that's what you're hoping for. Would be a lot of work, but if there isn't one available yet it might be worth it.

[asrulhadi]

Currently I am looking for a portable audio player for my project.
Need basic requirement. Just need to play sound file.
Modifying your code with appropriate access level could complete the job.

Would you mine if I fork your repo and use for my project?

[Chamberlain91]

It should be able to already play mp3 or ogg files with my abstraction. Why do you need the lower level MA functions?

[Chamberlain91]

https://github.com/Chamberlain91/Heirloom/tree/develop/Examples/Heirloom.Examples.PlayMusic

[asrulhadi]

So, you have abstracted it in the development branch.
I am just looking into the master branch. My Bad.

Looking into the code, it should be sufficient for my needs.

[Chamberlain91]

Awesome. Keep me up to date. I am quite interested that someone found this project

[asrulhadi]

A plan to publish nuget?