You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We (Chatie.IO) decided to use SSPL (Wiki) as the default License for our projects.
From the Server Side Public License FAQ, we can learn that the SSPL is the same as the AGPL, but make "Section 13" clear that "Remote Network Interaction"(AGPL) explicitly includes "Program as a Service"(SSPL) because the "Program as a Service" is definitely the cloud-native version of "Remote Network Interaction".
It's a shame that the OSI did not add the SSPL to their license list. I believe it's because there are too many conflict of interest from the community who governed the OSI.
I love Open Source Definition because it's damn right: the Arbiter should be the Community instead of OSI Corporation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
OSI CorporationThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: