You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm opening this issue to start the discussion about the preferred licensing model for the fusionscript package.
Currently I've adopted the license from Pymel as it has been adopted widely in pipelines and I haven't heard any issues about studios not adopting it because of its license. I think it's a pretty liberate and free license (plus it's super short!) so it should be fine. But I'm keeping this Issue open for some time to see where we land.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I typically go for LPGL, primarily motivated by this article, written by a genious. But MIT is also good. Both are widely used everywhere, including the VFX industry.
I'm opening this issue to start the discussion about the preferred licensing model for the
fusionscript
package.Currently I've adopted the license from Pymel as it has been adopted widely in pipelines and I haven't heard any issues about studios not adopting it because of its license. I think it's a pretty liberate and free license (plus it's super short!) so it should be fine. But I'm keeping this Issue open for some time to see where we land.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: