From 4267cfe780709e187d21bfd1d11a8d062eefe6cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuko Munakata <58264197+yukomunakata@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 10:28:40 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] specify return

---
 ch10/sem/README.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ch10/sem/README.md b/ch10/sem/README.md
index aca0609..763de71 100644
--- a/ch10/sem/README.md
+++ b/ch10/sem/README.md
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ To probe these distributed representations further, we can present words to the
 
 * Click on the `Test Epoch Plot` to see the correlation between the two activity patterns, which should be close to .4.  This will update with each result as we go forward here.
 
-* Now replace `Words2` with "spelling" (do not include quotes) and do `Init` and `Run` again (we will just label this as `Run` going forward).
+* Now replace `Words2` with "spelling" (do not include quotes), hit return, and do `Init` and `Run` again (we will just label this as `Run` going forward).
 
 You should see that attention and spelling are only related by around 0.06, indicating low similarity. This should match your overall intuition: we talk about attention as being critical for solving the binding problem in several different situations, but we don't talk much about the role of attention in spelling.