You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When building a neural network potential for plasma-surface interactions I find it advantageous to let the NNP describe intermediate range interactions, and leave the high-energy, repulsive short-range interaction to a simple empirical potential (e.g. ZBL). The empirical potential would be fitted to the difference between the NNP and ab-initio data (DFT). However, my NNP at the moment has a flat short-distance asymptotic behavior, and I would like to suppress the NNP so that it approaches 0. This would take the DFT-NNP difference closer to the functional form supported by the ZBL potential, resulting in a more accurate fit. See Figure 1 for the comparison of potential energy surfaces. Figure 1: PES of O atom on top of Cu(100) surface, top site as function of Cu-O distance
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to include an inner cutoff (not to be confused with the existing inner cutoff set by the $\alpha$ parameter) function that suppresses the NN at short distances. An example functional form would be $\frac{1}{2}(-\cos(\pi x) + 1)$ where $x = \frac{r - r_{ii}}{r_{io}-r_{ii}}$ and $r_{ii} = \beta r_c, r_{io} = \gamma r_c$ are the start and end of this 'inner cutoff'. The resulting overall function, with $\alpha = 0.5, \beta = 0.1, \gamma = 0.2$ looks like Figure 2, CT_ICOS: Figure 2: cutoff functions
Describe alternatives you've considered
For my own research I have hard-coded this into the CutoffFunction class. I will submit a PR soon that implements this for some symmetry function and symmetry function groups but I am not sure if it is the best way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
xyttyxy
added a commit
to xyttyxy/n2p2
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2023
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When building a neural network potential for plasma-surface interactions I find it advantageous to let the NNP describe intermediate range interactions, and leave the high-energy, repulsive short-range interaction to a simple empirical potential (e.g. ZBL). The empirical potential would be fitted to the difference between the NNP and ab-initio data (DFT). However, my NNP at the moment has a flat short-distance asymptotic behavior, and I would like to suppress the NNP so that it approaches 0. This would take the DFT-NNP difference closer to the functional form supported by the ZBL potential, resulting in a more accurate fit. See Figure 1 for the comparison of potential energy surfaces.
Figure 1: PES of O atom on top of Cu(100) surface, top site as function of Cu-O distance
Describe the solution you'd like$\alpha$ parameter) function that suppresses the NN at short distances. An example functional form would be $\frac{1}{2}(-\cos(\pi x) + 1)$ where $x = \frac{r - r_{ii}}{r_{io}-r_{ii}}$ and $r_{ii} = \beta r_c, r_{io} = \gamma r_c$ are the start and end of this 'inner cutoff'. The resulting overall function, with $\alpha = 0.5, \beta = 0.1, \gamma = 0.2$ looks like Figure 2, CT_ICOS:
I would like to include an inner cutoff (not to be confused with the existing inner cutoff set by the
Figure 2: cutoff functions
CT_COS:$\alpha=\beta=\gamma=0$ ; CT_COS_INNER $\alpha=0.5, \beta=\gamma=0$ ; CT_ICOS: $\alpha=0.5, \beta = 0.1, \gamma = 0.2$
Describe alternatives you've considered
For my own research I have hard-coded this into the
CutoffFunction
class. I will submit a PR soon that implements this for some symmetry function and symmetry function groups but I am not sure if it is the best way.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: