Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Finish the "simple exceptions testing" #1509

Open
9 of 11 tasks
OlivierBBB opened this issue Nov 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
9 of 11 tasks

Finish the "simple exceptions testing" #1509

OlivierBBB opened this issue Nov 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@lorenzogentile404
Labels
testing unit tests

Comments

@OlivierBBB
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuation of #1435

  • SUX
  • SOX
  • MXPX (MXP but shorter tests required): all cases covered except OpCode.COPY-type (Type 4) and OpCode.CALL-type (Type 5)
  • OOGX (MXP but shorter tests required, note that MXPX implies OOGX): @OlivierBBB do we need to test OOGX separately?
  • RDCX (OOB)
  • JUMPX (OOB)
  • STATICX
  • SSTOREX
  • ICPX (still under investigation due to Besu issue)
  • MAXCSX (still under investigation due to Besu issue)
  • OPCX

Originally posted by @lorenzogentile404 in #1435 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@lorenzogentile404 lorenzogentile404

Labels
testing unit tests
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lorenzogentile404 @OlivierBBB