Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-training/Fine-Tuning results in bad output #13

Open
sbhatia4 opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Re-training/Fine-Tuning results in bad output #13

sbhatia4 opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@sbhatia4
Copy link

sbhatia4 commented Jun 9, 2021

Hi,

ReadMe says about Training as following, but in reality, I don't see the same output after re-training either with Training or Val dataset of cityscapes.

To give you an idea: IoU Class number using pre-trained network - 73.5, whereas, if I train with Training Cityscapes dataset - IoU class number drops to 38.2 while evaluating the Val dataset of Cityscapes.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks a lot!!

Training
Train and evaluate a model with the following commands:

python train.py --static lrr --flow flownet2
python evaluate.py --static lrr --flow flownet2 --ckpt lrr_flownet2_it10000
This should match the performance of the pre-trained LRR model above. See the ./checkpoints directory where parameters are saved during the training procedure. Only LRR is supported at the moment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant