Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add configuration for minimum phase of historical LB data to retain #1934

Open
PhilMiller opened this issue Aug 24, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #1996
Open

Add configuration for minimum phase of historical LB data to retain #1934

PhilMiller opened this issue Aug 24, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #1996
Assignees
Labels
intro A potentially good introductory issue for a new developer to address type: task

Comments

@PhilMiller
Copy link
Member

What Needs to be Done?

Right now, the number of phases worth of historical LB data that the system retains is based on how many the installed load model says it wants to use. We should add a configuration parameter to set a minimum retention, independent of the load model. This will support later programmatic use of historical data, like outputting based on some trigger event/observation, with historical data before activation for context.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Describe potential solution outcome

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

@PhilMiller PhilMiller added the intro A potentially good introductory issue for a new developer to address label Sep 13, 2022
@PhilMiller
Copy link
Member Author

Likely a variable an relevant methods in LBManager, which would be used alongside calls to the active load model's method to report necessary history.

thearusable added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2022
thearusable added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2022
thearusable added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2022
thearusable added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 11, 2022
thearusable added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 23, 2024
…the containers rather than clearing their contents.
@ppebay ppebay assigned cwschilly and unassigned thearusable Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
intro A potentially good introductory issue for a new developer to address type: task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants