Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disagreement Possible in Word Type Setting #36

Open
Daniel061 opened this issue Jan 22, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Disagreement Possible in Word Type Setting #36

Daniel061 opened this issue Jan 22, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Daniel061
Copy link
Owner

Describe the bug
If the program changes a word type, i.e from adjective to noun, or the user responds a different way to an adjective test, for example, the memory cell storage for the word type and the new word type will cause a disagreement in the new routine c_Cerebellum.h::GatherAndSetAllSentenceData() at line 90 which currently does not have code to deal with it.

To Reproduce
Working on reproducing this. It is possible, I just don't know yet how to recreate it.
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
(coming soon!)

  1. Go to '...'
  2. Click on '....'
  3. Scroll down to '....'
  4. See error

Expected behavior
This is just what I don't yet know how to deal with. Should the program flag it and ask the user if he's sure? Or provide some other way to choose the correct word type. Some words have the ability to have multiple word types. Maybe this list of such words isn't too large to just trap them.

Additional context
From Version 6.1.004.12 forward.
I plan on adding validation for sentence structure to attempt to prevent this.
See c_Language.h::VerifyPattern()

@Daniel061 Daniel061 added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 22, 2019
@Daniel061 Daniel061 changed the title Disagreement Possible in Word Setting Disagreement Possible in Word Type Setting Jan 22, 2019
@Daniel061
Copy link
Owner Author

Added code to correct the disagreement. It has been coming from improperly setting a word which is corrected later.
The new code accepts the corrections.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant