Build oci package

[randomanderson]

What does this PR do?
Builds and publishes the OCI package for ruby

Motivation:
OCI packages are needed for the datadog install and fleet management

How to test the change?
Built packages need to be tested with internal tooling

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.11%. Comparing base (f8144d9) to head (67bcba0).
Report is 15 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3662   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.10%   98.11%           
=======================================
  Files        1232     1232           
  Lines       72560    72560           
  Branches     3447     3447           
=======================================
+ Hits        71188    71189    +1     
+ Misses       1372     1371    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-05-29 09:24:12

Comparing candidate commit 67bcba0 in PR branch landerson/oci-package with baseline commit f8144d9 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 10 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

Found an error

[BaptisteFoy]

Besides, the following hardocded path prevents us from starting.

dd-trace-rb/lib-injection/host_inject.rb

Line 9 in b908262

dd_lib_injection_path = "/opt/datadog/apm/library/ruby/#{ruby_api_version}"

We can replace it at the OCI packaging time with sed -i 's#/opt/datadog/apm/library/ruby/#/opt/datadog-packages/datadog-apm-library-ruby/$RUBY_PACKAGE_VERSION/#g' source/host_inject.rb.

[TonyCTHsu]

Generally, it is fine.

I submitted Request changes because we need to validate this artifact before merging.

[TonyCTHsu]

The test is passing! 👍