Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add pdb matching function #84

Open
LilySnow opened this issue Sep 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

add pdb matching function #84

LilySnow opened this issue Sep 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@LilySnow
Copy link
Collaborator

pdb matching is a very useful step for pdb analysis. It would be nice if we could add this to pdb2sql.

Expected performance:

INPUT:

  • a reference pdb file with multiple chains
  • a set of pdb files for the same protein complex but with different numbering and chain IDs

OUTPUT:

  • chain ID mapping
  • pdb files renumbered based on the reference pdb. Chain IDs are also changed based on the reference pdb

Ideally, we hope to separate pdb_matching into two functions (steps):

Step 1. pdb_match_chn_batch.py: match chain IDs of pdb files to ref.pdb. Output _newChnID.pdb files.
Note: This step can be skipped if model.pdb files have already matched chain IDs. This step is also error-prone when multiple chains are highly similar to each other. Therefore, a human visual check is necessary.

Step 2. pdb_renum_batch.py: align and renumber pdb files to ref.pdb. Output _renum.pdb files.

There are two existing solutions:

  1. https://github.com/LilySnow/PDB-matching (python + cpp)
  2. DeepRank/haddock-tools@ed9beee (python, by the haddock group)

Maybe we could use these solutions as the basis?

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Oct 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants