forked from PeterKDunn/SRM-Textbook
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
19-CIs-Intro.Rmd
33 lines (19 loc) · 1.56 KB
/
19-CIs-Intro.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
# (PART) Analysis: confidence intervals {-}
# Introducing confidence intervals {#CIIntro}
Chap. \@ref(SamplingVariation) introduced the idea of sampling variation.
In Chaps. \@ref(CIOneProportion) to \@ref(OddsRatiosCI), this idea is used to form *confidence intervals*.
Confidence intervals help answer [estimation-type RQ](#TypesOfRQs), where the precision of a *statistic* is of interest.
In this Part, answering estimation-type RQs is discussed for:
* Descriptive RQs:
* One proportion: Chap. \@ref(CIOneProportion), where the response variable is qualitative.
* One mean: Chap. \@ref(OneMeanConfInterval), where the response variable is quantitative.
* Mean difference: Chap. \@ref(PairedCI), for *paired* quantitative data.
* Relational or interventional RQs with a *comparison*:
* Comparing means in two groups: Chap. \@ref(CITwoMeans).
* Comparing odds in two groups: Chap. \@ref(OddsRatiosCI).
Answering estimation-type RQs for relational or interventional RQs with a *connection* is explored later (Chaps. \@ref(Correlation) and \@ref(Regression)).
The precision of statistics influences [decision-type RQ](#TypesOfRQs) too: when [statistics](#StatisticsAndParameters) precisely estimate [parameters](#StatisticsAndParameters), making decisions about parameters is easier.
The previous chapters, where tools for describing sampling variation were introduced, are used in this part to understand the precision of statistics.
```{r fig.cap="", fig.align="center", fig.width=3, out.width="35%"}
SixSteps(5, "Comparison RQs: CIs")
```