-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Investigate/fix "taxa without parents" in the pbdb hierarchy #151
Comments
Hi @KatjaSchulz, this one fell into the cracks. |
Hi @KatjaSchulz , This resource has now been uploaded to the server, ready for harvesting. Latest stats: A copy of the archive file here. |
Thanks, Eli! Queued up. |
It's a big one, but it would be great to get it reharvested soon if we can. |
@eliagbayani : @JRice alerted us to the fact that the pbdb hierarchy has a lot of "root nodes" (370), i.e., hierarchy entries that don't have any parents. Since this is a continually updated, community curated hierarchy, it's expected that there might be a few species, genera, families, etc. dangling around the root until somebody takes mercy on them and gives them a parent. But I don't remember there being quite so many. A spot check of some of the affected taxa reveals that they do have parents at the source, e.g.:
https://paleobiodb.org/data1.1/taxa/single.json?id=170202&show=attr
https://paleobiodb.org/data1.1/taxa/single.json?id=282936&show=attr
https://paleobiodb.org/data1.1/taxa/single.json?id=14054&show=attr
Is this just a matter of our data being old, and it will fix itself once we re-run the connector? Or is there something about these taxa that makes it difficult for our connector to catch their parents?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: