Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2024-11-29] [$250] [Workspace feeds - Direct] Search page Card filter should show card name #52554

Closed
JmillsExpensify opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 15 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Comments

@JmillsExpensify
Copy link

JmillsExpensify commented Nov 14, 2024

At the moment if you try to search for direct workspace cards, we show the card feed name, like so.

CleanShot 2024-11-14 at 13 11 52@2x (1)

Instead, we should be showing the card name in the Card filter list for search.
CleanShot 2024-11-14 at 13 37 37@2x

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021857041070045717217
  • Upwork Job ID: 1857041070045717217
  • Last Price Increase: 2024-11-14
  • Automatic offers:
    • allgandalf | Contributor | 104897589
Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @JmillsExpensify
@JmillsExpensify JmillsExpensify added Daily KSv2 Internal Requires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Nov 14, 2024
@JmillsExpensify JmillsExpensify self-assigned this Nov 14, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Current assignee @JmillsExpensify is eligible for the Bug assigner, not assigning anyone new.

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, I'm Nicolay from Callstack - expert contributor group - and I would like to work on this issue.

@JmillsExpensify JmillsExpensify added External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor and removed Internal Requires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff labels Nov 14, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021857041070045717217

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [Workspace feeds - Direct] Search page Card filter should show card name [$250] [Workspace feeds - Direct] Search page Card filter should show card name Nov 14, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Nov 14, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @suneox (External)

@JmillsExpensify
Copy link
Author

No proposals are needed on this issue, though adding the External label so we can have C+ help test/review the PR.

@JmillsExpensify JmillsExpensify removed the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Nov 14, 2024
@mountiny mountiny assigned mountiny and allgandalf and unassigned suneox Nov 14, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 14, 2024

📣 @allgandalf 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app!

Offer link
Upwork job
Please accept the offer and leave a comment on the Github issue letting us know when we can expect a PR to be ready for review 🧑‍💻
Keep in mind: Code of Conduct | Contributing 📖

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production label Nov 22, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [$250] [Workspace feeds - Direct] Search page Card filter should show card name [HOLD for payment 2024-11-29] [$250] [Workspace feeds - Direct] Search page Card filter should show card name Nov 22, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Nov 22, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 22, 2024

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.65-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-11-29. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 22, 2024

@allgandalf @JmillsExpensify @allgandalf The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@allgandalf can you please complete a checklist and suggest a test?

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

allgandalf commented Nov 28, 2024

BugZero Checklist:

  • [Contributor] Classify the bug:
Bug classification

Source of bug:

  • 1a. Result of the original design (eg. a case wasn't considered)
  • 1b. Mistake during implementation
  • 1c. Backend bug
  • 1z. Other: Result of Newly introduced Company Cards feature, couldn't have been caused by any changes

Where bug was reported:

  • 2a. Reported on production
  • 2b. Reported on staging (deploy blocker)
  • 2c. Reported on both staging and production
  • 2d. Reported on a PR
  • 2z. Other:

Who reported the bug:

  • 3a. Expensify user
  • 3b. Expensify employee
  • 3c. Contributor
  • 3d. QA
  • 3z. Other:
  • [Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.

    Link to comment: N/A

  • Add card advanced filter for Search #46666 This PR implemented the search page filter, but it was implemented in August (At that time we didn't have company cards feature on ND), so no offending PR as such here.

  • [Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.

    Link to discussion: N/A

  • [Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.

  • [BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.

    Link to issue:

Regression Test Proposal

Precondition:

  • User should have Company Card and Expensify cards assigned.

Test:

  1. Open App > Go to Search > Click on Filter > Card
  • Verify that Expensify card is shown as "Expensify Card".
  • Verify that any other card (Company Cards) is shown with card name.

Do we agree 👍 or 👎

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

@allgandalf can you please complete a checklist and suggest a test?

Done 🙇

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Daily KSv2 Overdue and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Nov 29, 2024
@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

Let's close this one

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 2, 2024

@JmillsExpensify, @narefyev91, @mountiny, @allgandalf Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

@JmillsExpensify
Copy link
Author

Upwork contract paid out and regression test created. We should be good here.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Dec 3, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Bugs and Follow Up Issues to Done in [#whatsnext] #expense Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants