Bump expensify-common to 2.0.101 #51073

NJ-2020 · 2024-10-18T08:38:00Z

Details

In this PR we decided to match a room name if they are preceded by newline/space.

Fixed Issues

$ #46299
PROPOSAL: #46299 (comment)

Tests

Open Expensify App
Navigate to any chat e.g. a workspace chat.
Enter the message #4856₹&_#7553 in composer and verify that only #4856 is highlighted.
Send the message and verify that the Concierge message mentions only #4856 for room creation.
Repeat Steps (2) and (3) and verify the expected result:
a. Message: #gh4h_+&&&-#ehhh, Expected Result: Only #gh4h
b. Message: #4856₹& #7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
c. Message: #4856₹&
#7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
d. Message: #4856₹&*#7553, Expected Result: Only #4856
e. Message: #4856₹&~#7553, Expected Result: Only #4856
f. Message: #4856₹& *#7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
g. Message: #4856₹& ~#7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
h. Message: #4856₹&
*#7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
i. Message: #4856₹&
~#7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
j. Message: #4856₹&
_#7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
k. Message: #4856₹&
-#7553, Expected Result: Only #4856
l. Message: #room-name123, Expected Result: #room-name123
m. Message: https://abc.com/abc#qwer, Expected Result: Nothing is highlighted

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-10-26.at.05.25.42.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2024-10-26.at.06.40.54.mov

iOS: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-10-26.at.05.55.43.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-10-26.at.06.25.36.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-10-26.at.04.51.17.mov

MacOS: Desktop

Screen.Recording.2024-10-26.at.04.56.52.mov

melvin-bot · 2024-10-18T08:38:05Z

@rojiphil Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

rojiphil

@NJ-2020 The version bump from 0.1.164 to 0.1.173 for the live-markdown library would also introduce other changes along with ours. Let us hold until the E/App PR comes up here.

Meanwhile can you please upload test videos on all platforms as required by the PR author checklist? Thanks.

NJ-2020 · 2024-10-23T04:48:09Z

@rojiphil Okay thank you

Skalakid · 2024-10-23T08:30:45Z

Here is the PR with the Live Markdown library bump, where we will address all the regressions that may appear

Skalakid · 2024-10-24T12:29:46Z

The PR with the Live Markdown bump has been merged

rojiphil · 2024-10-24T12:48:18Z

The PR with the Live Markdown bump has been merged

Ah! Nice. Thanks @Skalakid.

@NJ-2020 We can take this off hold. Also, #50990 has bumped the expensify-common version to 2.0.100. That means we only have to bump the version to 2.0.101 so that it matches the one in parser\dependencies in expensify-live-markdown.
Can you please merge with the latest main, make the above change, and upload the test videos for all platforms?

NJ-2020 · 2024-10-24T13:04:34Z

@rojiphil Okay, will do

rojiphil · 2024-10-26T09:36:15Z

Okay, will do

@NJ-2020 Can you please give an ETA for this as the issue does not deserve to be on-hold?

NJ-2020 · 2024-10-26T13:43:15Z

@rojiphil Sorry for the delay, Done

rojiphil · 2024-10-28T17:16:18Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

51073-web-safari-002.mp4

Android: Native

51073-android-native-001.mp4

iOS: mWeb Safari

51073-mweb-safari-001.mp4

Android: mWeb Chrome

51073-mweb-chrome-001.mp4

iOS: Native

51073-ios-native-001.mp4

MacOS: Desktop

51073-desktop-001.mp4

rojiphil

@NJ-2020 Thanks. I think being more specific in test cases as shown below can help the QA better:

Navigate to any chat e.g. a workspace chat.
Enter the message #4856₹&_#7553 in composer and verify that only #4856 is highlighted.
Send the message and verify that the Concierge message mentions only #4856 for room creation.
Repeat Steps (2) and (3) and verify the expected result:
a. Message: #gh4h_+&&&-#ehhh, Expected Result: Only #gh4h
b. Message: #4856₹& #7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
c. Message: #4856₹&
#7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
d. Message: #4856₹&*#7553, Expected Result: Only #4856
e. Message: #4856₹&~#7553, Expected Result: Only #4856
f. Message: #4856₹& *#7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
g. Message: #4856₹& ~#7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
h. Message: #4856₹&
*#7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
i. Message: #4856₹&
~#7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
j. Message: #4856₹&
_#7553, Expected Result: #4856 and #7553
k. Message: #4856₹&
-#7553, Expected Result: Only #4856
l. Message: #room-name123, Expected Result: #room-name123
m. Message: https://abc.com/abc#qwer, Expected Result: Nothing is highlighted

@Beamanator @rlinoz This PR ensures that the changes in expensify-common PR and react-native-live-markdown PR are working as expected.
Changes LGTM and works well too.
Over to you for review. Thanks.

NJ-2020 · 2024-10-29T02:41:57Z

I think being more specific in test cases as shown below can help the QA better

Done, thank you

Beamanator · 2024-10-29T06:50:59Z

package.json

-  "description": "New Expensify is the next generation of Expensify: a reimagination of payments based atop a foundation of chat.",
  "license": "MIT",
+  "description": "New Expensify is the next generation of Expensify: a reimagination of payments based atop a foundation of chat.",


NAB: Why this change? 🤷

Ohh sorry, done

thanks for updating!

OSBotify · 2024-10-29T13:50:38Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

github-actions · 2024-10-31T11:40:33Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/rlinoz in version: 9.0.56-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄	success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄	success ✅

github-actions · 2024-11-04T14:13:17Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.0.56-9 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄	skipped 🚫
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄	skipped 🚫

NJ-2020 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 18, 2024 08:38

melvin-bot bot requested review from rojiphil and removed request for a team October 18, 2024 08:38

NJ-2020 changed the title ~~bump expensify-common and react-native-live-markdown to latest version~~ Bump expensify-common and react-native-live-markdown to latest version Oct 18, 2024

NJ-2020 mentioned this pull request Oct 18, 2024

[HOLD for payment 2024-11-11] [$250] Android - Room - Whisper displays 1 mention when 2 mentions are send in specific way #46299

Closed

6 tasks

rojiphil reviewed Oct 23, 2024

View reviewed changes

NJ-2020 changed the title ~~Bump expensify-common and react-native-live-markdown to latest version~~ [HOLD #50174] Bump expensify-common and react-native-live-markdown to latest version Oct 23, 2024

NJ-2020 changed the title ~~[HOLD #50174] Bump expensify-common and react-native-live-markdown to latest version~~ Bump expensify-common to 2.0.101 Oct 26, 2024

fix conflicts

5755336

NJ-2020 force-pushed the fix/46299 branch from 144aa8b to 5755336 Compare October 26, 2024 12:04

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into fix/46299

824ed80

rojiphil approved these changes Oct 28, 2024

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot bot requested a review from Beamanator October 28, 2024 17:32

Beamanator previously approved these changes Oct 29, 2024

View reviewed changes

revert package.json file

2d7b115

NJ-2020 dismissed Beamanator’s stale review via 2d7b115 October 29, 2024 07:27

Beamanator approved these changes Oct 29, 2024

View reviewed changes

rlinoz approved these changes Oct 29, 2024

View reviewed changes

rlinoz merged commit d78be88 into Expensify:main Oct 29, 2024
22 checks passed

github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2024

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2024-10-31 #51778

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Bump expensify-common to 2.0.101 #51073

Bump expensify-common to 2.0.101 #51073

NJ-2020 commented Oct 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 18, 2024

rojiphil left a comment

NJ-2020 commented Oct 23, 2024

Skalakid commented Oct 23, 2024

Skalakid commented Oct 24, 2024

rojiphil commented Oct 24, 2024

NJ-2020 commented Oct 24, 2024

rojiphil commented Oct 26, 2024

NJ-2020 commented Oct 26, 2024

rojiphil commented Oct 28, 2024

rojiphil left a comment

NJ-2020 commented Oct 29, 2024

Beamanator Oct 29, 2024

NJ-2020 Oct 29, 2024

Beamanator Oct 29, 2024

OSBotify commented Oct 29, 2024

github-actions bot commented Oct 31, 2024

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Bump expensify-common to 2.0.101 #51073

Bump expensify-common to 2.0.101 #51073

Conversation

NJ-2020 commented Oct 18, 2024 • edited Loading

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 18, 2024

rojiphil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

NJ-2020 commented Oct 23, 2024

Skalakid commented Oct 23, 2024

Skalakid commented Oct 24, 2024

rojiphil commented Oct 24, 2024

NJ-2020 commented Oct 24, 2024

rojiphil commented Oct 26, 2024

NJ-2020 commented Oct 26, 2024

rojiphil commented Oct 28, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

rojiphil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

NJ-2020 commented Oct 29, 2024

Beamanator Oct 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

NJ-2020 Oct 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Beamanator Oct 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

OSBotify commented Oct 29, 2024

github-actions bot commented Oct 31, 2024

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

NJ-2020 commented Oct 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading