Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error in Multiple pathfinding iterations #161

Open
AsadTanvir opened this issue Jun 29, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Error in Multiple pathfinding iterations #161

AsadTanvir opened this issue Jun 29, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@AsadTanvir
Copy link

AsadTanvir commented Jun 29, 2018

In the configurations options' list given in the github repository, there's no parameter given as "max_pf_iterations". But when I run the example networks (say Springfield), there I find this parameter "max_pf_iterations =1" generated on the output ft_output_config.txt file. Later when I added this parameter in the input config_ft.txt file with a value equal to 2 and ran the simulation, it's throwing an error. I tried this with other networks too, but the same error kept coming for multiple pathfinding iterations in each and every case.

Can you please check what might be the reason for this unexpected error? The ft_debug.log and ft_output_config files have been attached.

ft_debug.log
ft_output_config.txt

danielsclint pushed a commit to danielsclint/fast-trips that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2018
@danielsclint
Copy link

The max_pf_iterations flag isn't being read. This is resolved in a PR under review right now. Until that PR is accepted, the code defaults to 10 pathfinding iterations. The key error looks different, but I can't be for sure.

@AsadTanvir
Copy link
Author

In this case, it's finishing after 1 pathfinding iterations by default. I should have added that I was using the codes from the "develop" branch, if this might be one of the reasons?

e-lo pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants