You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When fixed effect variables are included in the formula, the constant coefficient is no longer calculated and/or displayed in the regression results. Is there a way to adjust this so that the constant is also estimated?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks a lot for your positive feedback on our ongoing project.
Maybe you could submit a pull request where the regression output also prints some well defined constant (outside of the fixed effects themselves).
I was curious about this so I decided to do some checking. Stata's reghdfe just averages the fixed effects and sums those values. So, if the fixed effects are saved, then the intercept would be: sum(mean.(skipmissing.(eachol(rr.fe))))
I think adding this is also necessary to solve #134 since to predict values where there is not a fixed effect, Stata uses the intercept.
Thanks a lot for your positive feedback on our ongoing project. Maybe you could submit a pull request where the regression output also prints some well defined constant (outside of the fixed effects themselves).
Sorry, how to submit a pull request to make the coefficient of constant show ?
When fixed effect variables are included in the formula, the constant coefficient is no longer calculated and/or displayed in the regression results. Is there a way to adjust this so that the constant is also estimated?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: