Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP_Wrapp 2020 cryo em structure of the 2019 n co v spike #58

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: literature-review
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

egoldber
Copy link
Contributor

Literature Review Notes

@hannahbrucemacdonald
Copy link
Contributor

The README file doesn't seem to have summary + bulletpoints updated yet!

@egoldber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes! Still a draft!! Sorry I will tell you when it is ready for review -- I didn't know if I could tag you later in the process so I did so when I made the branch!

Copy link
Contributor

@4383 4383 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello

See my inline comments about the markdown syntax.

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
# **Citation**
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This already a title so you don't need to bold you text here.

This ought be:

# Citation

# **Citation**
Wrapp, D. *et al.* Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. *Science* **367**, 1260–1263 (2020).

# **Summary of Article**
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same thing here

* Include 2-3 bullet points on the summary of the article
* _What were the main take aways?_

# **Additional Notes**
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And here

@jchodera
Copy link
Member

@egoldber : Is this worth cleaning up and merging, or should we just close?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants