-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP_Wrapp 2020 cryo em structure of the 2019 n co v spike #58
base: literature-review
Are you sure you want to change the base?
WIP_Wrapp 2020 cryo em structure of the 2019 n co v spike #58
Conversation
The README file doesn't seem to have summary + bulletpoints updated yet! |
Yes! Still a draft!! Sorry I will tell you when it is ready for review -- I didn't know if I could tag you later in the process so I did so when I made the branch! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello
See my inline comments about the markdown syntax.
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | |||
# **Citation** |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This already a title so you don't need to bold you text here.
This ought be:
# Citation
# **Citation** | ||
Wrapp, D. *et al.* Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. *Science* **367**, 1260–1263 (2020). | ||
|
||
# **Summary of Article** |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same thing here
* Include 2-3 bullet points on the summary of the article | ||
* _What were the main take aways?_ | ||
|
||
# **Additional Notes** |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And here
@egoldber : Is this worth cleaning up and merging, or should we just close? |
Literature Review Notes