Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bedrock Compatibility Solution #557

Open
DecypherMC opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Bedrock Compatibility Solution #557

DecypherMC opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
Type: Feature Request New feature or request

Comments

@DecypherMC
Copy link

Describe the feature

Hello there, like a lot of people who use this plugin, I use custom GUI's to make the battlepass look clean and professional. This is great for java players, but unfortunately with bedrock players it becomes a complete mess to the point where it's almost unusable. This is a problem with all custom GUI's just because of the shape of the bedrock players inventory as well as java resource packs being incompatible with bedrock. On my server, we use deluxemenus and we have it check for a permission node that we assign to bedrock accounts when they join. If they have this permission, then it shows them a different GUI. We use this for all of our GUI's except battlepass since we use the built-in battlepass GUI.

My suggestion is to have an option to check if a player is on a bedrock account (you could check for a specific permission like I do for my other menu's or find another way) and if so to allow us to show them a different set of GUI's. This would solve the bedrock compatibility issue and allow us server owners to continue to use custom GUI's for java players without basically sacrificing the entire feature for bedrock players.

@KPGTB KPGTB added the Type: Feature Request New feature or request label Jul 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Feature Request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants