You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not 100% sure if it is a bug or feature but previously (GBrowse 2.52) the scaling mechanism of several subtracks worked different than in GBrowse 2.54. When scaling wiggle_xyplot to the local min/max it scaled previously all tracks to the same value. Now it scales each subtrack to it's own min/max. The function of GBrowse 2.52 of a combined local min/max was very helpful to judge expression differences of normalized wiggle tracks. Scaling to a fixed value still scales all subtracks to the same value what is great. Is there some possibility to configure/reimplement the feature of combined local min/max for all subtracks?
Thanks a lot for your great work,
Thomas
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
thanks for the reply. I'm sure since we've both GBrowse instances running in parallel. Both access the same sample & track configs and data files. This works only for subtracks (defined over metadata.txt, GBrowse 2.52) and not for independent tracks.
Hi,
I'm not 100% sure if it is a bug or feature but previously (GBrowse 2.52) the scaling mechanism of several subtracks worked different than in GBrowse 2.54. When scaling wiggle_xyplot to the local min/max it scaled previously all tracks to the same value. Now it scales each subtrack to it's own min/max. The function of GBrowse 2.52 of a combined local min/max was very helpful to judge expression differences of normalized wiggle tracks. Scaling to a fixed value still scales all subtracks to the same value what is great. Is there some possibility to configure/reimplement the feature of combined local min/max for all subtracks?
Thanks a lot for your great work,
Thomas
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: