Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix copy command to store information better #43

Open
3 tasks
Ghoulboy78 opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 2 comments
Open
3 tasks

Fix copy command to store information better #43

Ghoulboy78 opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@Ghoulboy78
Copy link
Owner

Ghoulboy78 commented Jan 27, 2021

Cos right now it's not particularly efficient. I think I'lll store in a similar way to structure files etc.

  • Make copy with no pos just copy from the northwest corner
  • Change saving system
  • Change code in structure() to be more compact once previous is completed.
@Ghoulboy78 Ghoulboy78 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 27, 2021
@Ghoulboy78 Ghoulboy78 self-assigned this Jan 27, 2021
@Ghoulboy78 Ghoulboy78 added this to the v1.3.0 milestone Jan 27, 2021
@Firigion
Copy link
Collaborator

You mean the clipboard to disc or the virtual clipboard?

@altrisi
Copy link
Collaborator

altrisi commented Jan 28, 2021

Tbh I'd just store it directly as a structure file but in memory, and make the structure save command just write it to a file, making it simpler to save any of the two (a selection/an already existing clipboard, since saving current selection would basically call "make" a clipboard then save).

That would also make it simpler to at some point save the clipboards when closing/restarting/leaving the server, just write_file and that's it.

Ghoulboy78 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2021
still wip, but gonna fix that in #43
@Ghoulboy78 Ghoulboy78 modified the milestones: v1.3.0, v1.4.0 Mar 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants