Add date to qf round donation existance condition #1870
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/repositories/donationRepository.ts (2)
664-671: LGTM! Consider adding an index for better performance.The inner join with
qf_roundtable and the temporal constraint are correctly implemented. To optimize query performance, consider adding a composite index on the donation table:CREATE INDEX idx_donation_qf_round ON donation ("qfRoundId", "projectId", "userId", "createdAt");
Line range hint
672-679: Enhance error handling with specific error types.The current error handling catches all errors and logs them generically. Consider categorizing errors (e.g., database connection issues vs query syntax errors) for better debugging.
} catch (err) { + if (err instanceof QueryFailedError) { + logger.error( + 'Database query failed in isVerifiedDonationExists()', + { params, error: err }, + ); + } else { logger.error( - 'Error executing the query in isVerifiedDonationExists() function', + 'Unexpected error in isVerifiedDonationExists()', err, ); + } return false; }
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/resolvers/donationResolver.test.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-1000: Improve test organization and maintainabilityThe test file has several areas that could be improved for better maintainability:
- Test data setup is scattered across individual test cases rather than using shared fixtures
- Many magic numbers and hardcoded values are used throughout the tests
- Some test cases have large setup blocks that could be extracted into helper functions
- Test descriptions could be more descriptive about the scenarios being tested
Consider these improvements:
- Create shared test fixtures for common entities (projects, users, donations)
- Extract test data setup into helper functions
- Use constants for common values
- Add more descriptive test case names
Example refactor:
// Test fixtures const TEST_FIXTURES = { QF_ROUND: { duration: 10, minScore: 8, allocatedFund: 100 }, DONATIONS: { standardAmount: 10, largeAmount: 100 } }; // Helper function async function createTestQfRound(options = {}) { return QfRound.create({ isActive: true, name: new Date().toString(), minimumPassportScore: TEST_FIXTURES.QF_ROUND.minScore, allocatedFund: TEST_FIXTURES.QF_ROUND.allocatedFund, beginDate: new Date(), endDate: moment().add(TEST_FIXTURES.QF_ROUND.duration, 'days').toDate(), ...options }).save(); }
Line range hint
1-1000: Add missing test coverage for error casesThe test suite is missing coverage for several important error scenarios:
- Network timeouts/errors when verifying transactions
- Invalid transaction data
- Edge cases around QF round dates
- Concurrent donation processing
Add test cases for these scenarios:
describe('error handling', () => { it('should handle network timeouts gracefully', async () => { // Test implementation }); it('should validate transaction data properly', async () => { // Test implementation }); it('should handle edge cases around QF round dates', async () => { // Test implementation }); it('should handle concurrent donations correctly', async () => { // Test implementation }); });
Line range hint
1-1000: Consider adding performance testsThe test suite focuses on functional testing but lacks performance-related test cases that could be important for production scenarios.
Add performance test cases:
describe('performance tests', () => { it('should handle large number of concurrent donations', async () => { const CONCURRENT_DONATIONS = 100; const donations = Array(CONCURRENT_DONATIONS).fill(null).map(() => createDonationData() ); const results = await Promise.all( donations.map(donation => axios.post(graphqlUrl, { query: createDonationMutation, variables: { ...donation } }) ) ); // Assert results }); it('should efficiently query donations with complex filters', async () => { // Test implementation for query performance }); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/resolvers/donationResolver.test.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/resolvers/donationResolver.test.ts (1)
718-718: Verify the QF round donation test timing
The test case creates a donation with createdAt set to 8 days in the future, which falls within the QF round's 10-day window. However, using future dates in tests can be problematic as they may cause flaky tests when run close to the expiration date.
Consider using relative dates based on the QF round's begin/end dates instead:
-createdAt: moment().add(8, 'days').toDate(),
+createdAt: moment(qfRound.beginDate).add(1, 'day').toDate(),✅ Verification successful
Future dates in tests are consistently used across the test suite
The test file consistently uses future dates for testing donation-related functionality. This is a deliberate pattern where:
- QF round tests use 8-10 days in the future for round windows
- Other donation tests use various future dates (30, 45, 202, 510 days) to test different scenarios
- Date ranges in queries consistently align with the donation creation dates
The usage of moment().add(8, 'days') in this test case follows the established pattern and is intentionally set within the QF round's 10-day window. Since this is a consistent testing strategy throughout the file, changing it to use relative dates would require refactoring the entire test suite's approach to time-based testing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are other tests using future dates that could be problematic
rg -A 2 "moment\(\)\.add\([0-9]+, 'days'\)" src/resolvers/donationResolver.test.ts
Length of output: 5857
Related to: https://github.com/orgs/Giveth/projects/9/views/1?sliceBy%5Bvalue%5D=CarlosQ96&pane=issue&itemId=79606987&issue=Giveth%7Cgiveth-dapps-v2%7C4728
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
New Features
Chores