You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On the dataset level the label "Grad der Zugänglichkeit" is used for dcterms:accessRights with the three level "public" "non-public" and "restricted". On distribution the dcterms:accessRights does not exist, however, there is the dcterms:rights that have been given the same label "Grad der Zugänglichkeit".
I think this label is wrong since dcterms:rights are supposed to point to a URL, or perhaps to a blank node with further triples. I do not think the "Grad der Zugänglichkeit" label will fit in either of these cases. In addition, it makes it easy to mix it up with the dcterms:accessRights.
Furthermore, on the catalog level, the label for dcterms:rights is "Nutzungsbestimmungen", I think that is probably a better label that should be used on the distribution as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On the dataset level the label "Grad der Zugänglichkeit" is used for dcterms:accessRights with the three level "public" "non-public" and "restricted". On distribution the dcterms:accessRights does not exist, however, there is the dcterms:rights that have been given the same label "Grad der Zugänglichkeit".
I think this label is wrong since dcterms:rights are supposed to point to a URL, or perhaps to a blank node with further triples. I do not think the "Grad der Zugänglichkeit" label will fit in either of these cases. In addition, it makes it easy to mix it up with the dcterms:accessRights.
Furthermore, on the catalog level, the label for dcterms:rights is "Nutzungsbestimmungen", I think that is probably a better label that should be used on the distribution as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: