Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Can we add another location for "binary" files that pass through to the output? #233

Open
costateixeira opened this issue Jul 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Can we add another location for "binary" files that pass through to the output? #233

costateixeira opened this issue Jul 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
@lmckenzi
Labels
Approved Approved on tooling call enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@costateixeira
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently we use input/images to expose config files for server, http files for testing..
Should we add a input/binaries?
@lmckenzi lmckenzi added enhancement New feature or request Approved Approved on tooling call labels Jul 11, 2023
@lmckenzi
Copy link
Contributor

Rather than calling it 'binaries', will call it 'passthru' because it can be used for any source file you just want to propagate into the output. Will also update the documentaiton.

@lmckenzi lmckenzi self-assigned this Jul 11, 2023
@costateixeira
Copy link
Collaborator Author

costateixeira commented Jul 12, 2023 via email

@lmckenzi
Copy link
Contributor

y

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@lmckenzi lmckenzi

Labels
Approved Approved on tooling call enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lmckenzi @costateixeira