Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider use of Makarius' YXML library #71

Open
mn200 opened this issue Jul 25, 2012 · 4 comments
Open

Consider use of Makarius' YXML library #71

mn200 opened this issue Jul 25, 2012 · 4 comments

Comments

@mn200
Copy link
Member

mn200 commented Jul 25, 2012

See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.hol/1502 and https://bitbucket.org/makarius/yxml/src/

We already have a compressed (hash-consed) format for our types, terms and theorems in DiskThms and TheoryPP.

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

@xrchz
Copy link
Member

xrchz commented Aug 7, 2012

It would also be worth testing whether saving theories as OpenTheory packages and replaying the proofs on load would be intolerably slow. (Proofs, not proof search.) One advantage would be enabling better compositionality/reuse of stuff under src.

@myreen
Copy link
Contributor

myreen commented Aug 7, 2012

I doubt proof replay on load would be tolerable. Anyway, how large would
these proofs be? My impression is that real proof developments produce
enormous OpenTheory proofs.

On 7 August 2012 08:35, Ramana Kumar [email protected] wrote:

It would also be worth testing whether saving theories as OpenTheory
packages and replaying the proofs on load would be intolerably slow.
(Proofs, not proof search.) One advantage would be enabling better
compositionality/reuse of stuff under src.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/71#issuecomment-7545888.

@mn200
Copy link
Member Author

mn200 commented Aug 7, 2012

It's an experiment worth doing. But it certainly belongs to another issue.

@mn200
Copy link
Member Author

mn200 commented Jan 12, 2023

The gmane link is no good; this one at mail-archive.com is probably/possibly what I linked to earlier.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants