Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SEN 2011-15 #437

Open
eclee25 opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 13 comments
Open

SEN 2011-15 #437

eclee25 opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 13 comments
Labels
no-W model no-W model was used because there were all-0 obs

Comments

@eclee25
Copy link
Collaborator

eclee25 commented May 15, 2023

No description provided.

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jun 6, 2023

Data pull:
HASH: 6772ea9da4f43ddc3da11c494a573af2ca3dd3c8
config

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jun 7, 2023

Model run:
HASH: 6772ea9da4f43ddc3da11c494a573af2ca3dd3c8

@javierps
Copy link
Collaborator

Subnational output rhats not great, some convergence issues with sd_w. This is due to only one sub-national observation.

Suggestion: Accept or in model with no w.

@eclee25
Copy link
Collaborator Author

eclee25 commented Jun 15, 2023

Minimal subnational obs but otherwise ok. High rate cell in E border.

Opinion: Temp Approve and rerun with spatial_effect: no and higher sfrac_thresh_border

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 24, 2023

Config

Data pull:

HASH: 211913e0eb7d570ed62c48bc1ae9ecd6671a6cbc

Data pull failed log file

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 24, 2023

Data pull and model run (dev_taxdat_funs_fix branch):

HASH: 31f14227cd28a9824db72b7a6c45b0d65652872e

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 25, 2023

country data report

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 27, 2023

not converged. this run was also not moved to the no w column. Rerun without spatial effect.

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 27, 2023

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 27, 2023

One chain has a little bit convergency issue. Modeled cases are slightly overestaimted but still fewer than 15 cases.

Other convergency issues have been solved.

Suggestion: accept no-w run.

@eclee25
Copy link
Collaborator Author

eclee25 commented Aug 4, 2023

Minor convergence issues but very few cases. Minimal subnat data, no-W model.
Approve no-W run.

@eclee25 eclee25 added the no-W model no-W model was used because there were all-0 obs label Aug 4, 2023
@javierps
Copy link
Collaborator

Sep 2023 Production run: one chain with convergence issues.

Suggestion: investigate further.

@eclee25
Copy link
Collaborator Author

eclee25 commented Sep 19, 2023

After removing the unused parameters from sampling, all diags look good.
Approve

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-W model no-W model was used because there were all-0 obs
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants