Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SWZ 2016-20 #446

Open
eclee25 opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 17 comments
Open

SWZ 2016-20 #446

eclee25 opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 17 comments
Labels
no-W model no-W model was used because there were all-0 obs

Comments

@eclee25
Copy link
Collaborator

eclee25 commented May 15, 2023

No description provided.

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jun 6, 2023

Data pull:
HASH: 6772ea9da4f43ddc3da11c494a573af2ca3dd3c8
config

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jun 7, 2023

Model run:
HASH: 6772ea9da4f43ddc3da11c494a573af2ca3dd3c8

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jun 8, 2023

country data report failed: log file

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jun 9, 2023

Country data report

  • In this report, there are no plots of
  1. Variance of cases in gam input per grid cell
  2. Variance of rates per 100000 in gam input per grid cell

because there are few data, so each t, sx, and sy in gam input only has one y value. variance is unable to be estimated.

  • for gam input cases plot, it's not in log scale because all the observations are 0.

@javierps
Copy link
Collaborator

Really very little data here. Only a couple of cases in the national level imputation for 2017. Not surprising to have convergence issues in w and sd_w.

Suggestion: Separate category for these very low count runs.

@eclee25
Copy link
Collaborator Author

eclee25 commented Jun 15, 2023

Opinion: Temp Approve and rerun with spatial_effect: no

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 3, 2023

Updated config

Data pull:
HASH: f56d5a942b106ad7750b9be31c0456cefa5b6dc7

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 5, 2023

model run

HASH f56d5a942b106ad7750b9be31c0456cefa5b6dc7

@eclee25
Copy link
Collaborator Author

eclee25 commented Jul 6, 2023

All looks good

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 24, 2023

Config

Data pull & Model run:

HASH: 211913e0eb7d570ed62c48bc1ae9ecd6671a6cbc

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 24, 2023

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 24, 2023

Data pull and model run (dev_taxdat_funs_fix branch):

HASH: 31f14227cd28a9824db72b7a6c45b0d65652872e

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 25, 2023

country data report

@QLLZ
Copy link
Collaborator

QLLZ commented Jul 27, 2023

Results look good.

Suggestion: accept.

@eclee25
Copy link
Collaborator Author

eclee25 commented Aug 4, 2023

No subnat data no-W model. All diags look good.
Approve

@eclee25 eclee25 added the no-W model no-W model was used because there were all-0 obs label Aug 4, 2023
@javierps
Copy link
Collaborator

Sep 2023 Production run: convergence issues,

Suggestion: investigate further.

@eclee25
Copy link
Collaborator Author

eclee25 commented Sep 19, 2023

After removing the unused parameters from sampling, all diags look good.
Approve

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-W model no-W model was used because there were all-0 obs
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants