You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A question we may also get asked is "can we consolidate instances where a publisher has used our name, but not the reference?"
This isn't as straightforward, as we don't have a clear guidance on what exactly a name should be
The query is whether it could be feasible to take the various strings we know are in use (as we've seen in the test environment) and then search for any use of these, but without an organisation reference....
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That give Activity IDs that should probably have XM-DAC-47066 added as a @ref in participating as it matches one of the names used.
Another option is finding and adding appropriate @ref at import time, probably not too hard just going on exact string matches but it would be under the dportal fixes the data rather than the publishers fix the data umbrella.
We know this is good and useful, and anchored in the specific string in the
participating-org/@ref
fieldhttps://d-portal.org/ctrack.html?/participating-org@ref=XM-DAC-47066#view=main
A question we may also get asked is "can we consolidate instances where a publisher has used our name, but not the reference?"
This isn't as straightforward, as we don't have a clear guidance on what exactly a name should be
The query is whether it could be feasible to take the various strings we know are in use (as we've seen in the test environment) and then search for any use of these, but without an organisation reference....
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: