You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I need to represent multi-channel electrophysiology data. This could be done either by modifying the existing Trace shape or by creating a new shape for multi-channel data, leaving Trace specific for single-channel data.
Any thoughts on the best approach?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your question, @apdavison ! My feeling is that it would be most appropriate to use the Trace shape to describe shared property shapes between all traces and hence to create more specialised shapes for multi-channel electrophysiology data as well as single-unit electrophysiology recordings. Maybe you could come up with a proposal for the multi-channel trace shape? We could take care of the refactoring of the existing Trace shape to remove the property shapes which are specific to the single-unit recording use case. What do you think, @MFSY ?
A request for feedback:
I need to represent multi-channel electrophysiology data. This could be done either by modifying the existing Trace shape or by creating a new shape for multi-channel data, leaving Trace specific for single-channel data.
Any thoughts on the best approach?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: