Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 26, 2018. It is now read-only.

Identifying People and Organizations #29

Open
tedhabermann opened this issue Dec 27, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

Identifying People and Organizations #29

tedhabermann opened this issue Dec 27, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@tedhabermann
Copy link
Contributor

Identifiers spread throughout ISO 19115 and 19115-1 provide important hooks to other systems and supports the general best practice "identify early and identify often". DataCite (https://www.datacite.org) has recently published a metadata recommendation that includes identifiers for people/organizations. This idea is being implemented internationally in systems like ORCID (http://orcid.org) and is clearly important for clear and unambiguous identification of people (and organizations?).

I propose that we add a role identifier 0..* : MD_Identifier to the CI_Party class to accommodate this proposal.

@amilan17
Copy link

This would be a very useful addition!

@amilan17 amilan17 reopened this Dec 29, 2015
@smrgeoinfo
Copy link

That makes sense to me, and looks like the right place to insert it. The way things stand currently, you'd have to put an xlink:href with the URI on CI_Party, or do the Anchor substitution for CharacterString on the individual or organization name.

@DaveDanko
Copy link

@tedhabermann to be clear you want to add an extension to CI_Party in 19115-2 to provide for this identifier i.e. create a CE_Party adding a new attribute "roleIdentifier"?
from looking at the links you provided it seems to be an identifier for an individual or organization or a researcher and their activities. (to distinguish JJCool researching worm castings from JJCool studying solar flares).
I think the use of roleIdentifier would confuse people with the role in CI_Responsibility. How about partyIdentifier 0..* :MD_Identifier ?

@kateroberts
Copy link

I think this is a great idea, too; And agree with Dave's suggestion to name it something like partyIdentifier 0..* :MD_Identifier, under CI_Responsibility/CI_Party

@tedhabermann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dave, et al.,

This is a small change... not sure we need a new class (CE_Party)... Just add a new role to CI_Party... This class is used a lot, changing it could be a problem...

Ted

==== Ted Habermann ========================
Director of Earth Science, The HDF Group
Voice: (217) 531-4202
Email: [email protected]
==== HDF: Software That Powers Science ====

From: Dave Danko <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]>
Reply-To: ISO-TC211/19115-2Revision <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Monday, January 4, 2016 at 12:52 PM
To: ISO-TC211/19115-2Revision <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: Ted Habermann <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [19115-2Revision] Identifying People and Organizations (#29)

@tedhabermannhttps://github.com/tedhabermann to be clear you want to add an extension to CI_Party in 19115-2 to provide for this identifier i.e. create a CE_Party adding a new attribute "roleIdentifier"?
from looking at the links you provided it seems to be an identifier for an individual or organization or a researcher and their activities. (to distinguish JJCool researching worm castings from JJCool studying solar flares).
I think the use of roleIdentifier would confuse people with the role in CI_Responsibility. How about partyIdentifier 0..* :MD_Identifier ?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/29#issuecomment-168782036.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants