Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Theme must support two types of site branding #1

Open
strogonoff opened this issue Mar 15, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Theme must support two types of site branding #1

strogonoff opened this issue Mar 15, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@strogonoff
Copy link
Collaborator

strogonoff commented Mar 15, 2019

Currently we have a heterogenous site branding situation, where some sites have short proper nouns as names (“Geolexica”), while others don’t (“Resources from ISO/TC 211 Geographic information/Geomatics”).

This is a bit of a hurdle if we want our Jekyll theme to be used consistently across TC sites: short proper name calls for different header treatment in site layout (spacing, typography, presence of tagline, etc.).

Currently the theme is optimized short names, so it works great for Geolexica, but on flip side causes other TC sites to have e.g. words “ISO” and “TC” redundantly repeated in site header.

Screen Shot 2019-03-14 at 5 45 03 PM

It doesn’t seem possible to have consistency here (we already have the domains, plus we probably just can’t come up with proper names for all TC sites), so the theme should support two slightly different layouts.

@strogonoff strogonoff added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 15, 2019
@strogonoff strogonoff self-assigned this Mar 15, 2019
@strogonoff
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Issue description may be a bit fuzzy, but I’ve found a good solution (I believe) and am addressing this in upcoming release of the TC theme.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant