Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BlockSparseArrays] Allow more general axes #1467

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 25, 2024

Conversation

mtfishman
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.41%. Comparing base (e08e131) to head (42978ca).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Current head 42978ca differs from pull request most recent head ac72a72

Please upload reports for the commit ac72a72 to get more accurate results.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1467       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   43.65%   76.41%   +32.76%     
===========================================
  Files         136      148       +12     
  Lines        8806     9638      +832     
===========================================
+ Hits         3844     7365     +3521     
+ Misses       4962     2273     -2689     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mtfishman mtfishman changed the title [BlockSparseArrays] Generalize axes [BlockSparseArrays] Allow more general axes May 25, 2024
@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit cd766a2 into main May 25, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
@mtfishman mtfishman deleted the BlockSparseArrays_generalize_axes branch May 25, 2024 22:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants