You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Going over encoding guidelines for update to P5, and I found that we say for disjunctive lists that there should be a pop-up saying that the manuscript has brackets here. Newton-dev does not do this, and I think it would actually be preferable (if possible) to surround the list with brackets to reflect how the manuscript looks better.
I would be happy to implement the feature, but what about adding { and } before and after?
Although the curly brackets cannot be the size of the two lines, is it a really serious matter?
If it matters and if there are more similar cases that can be applied, I would try to add some code to render a larger size bracket.
I agree that adding the { and } before and after is a better choice than what's described in the encoding guide right now. And I don't even think that it's super necessary to make them bigger. Let me check with Bill and Jim today about it.
Going over encoding guidelines for update to P5, and I found that we say for disjunctive lists that there should be a pop-up saying that the manuscript has brackets here. Newton-dev does not do this, and I think it would actually be preferable (if possible) to surround the list with brackets to reflect how the manuscript looks better.
For example, here's ALCH00014:
And the XML:
It would be great if we could put curly brackets on either side of the disjunctive list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: